Why is there
such rancorous conflict in America over creationism and evolution?
Other countries don't suffer form this, so why does the United States?
Is it simply a question about religion? Is it because of Christian
fundamentalism?
In their recent book Species
of Origins, Karl W. Giberson and Donald A. Yerxa argue that such
answers really miss the point because evolution conflict is more about
culture than simply religion. Every culture needs a creation story
because such stories tell us about the origins of our world and, more
importantly, about our place in that world. When two incompatible
creation stories come into contact, the result is personal and cultural
alienation - and conflict.
In the case of America, there are two
competing world views which are given nearly equal authority: natural
science and traditional Christian religion. Unfortunately, they offer
different creation stories which, for many, are entirely incompatible.
Although this cultural divide is the focus of the book, the more
general purpose is to explain the different positions taken by people
in the debate. Secular readers will gain more insight on people's
religious positions, and religious readers will better understand the
perspective of natural science.
The possibility of achieving some measure
of mutual understanding is crucial. Many religious believers regard
those who accept evolution as fools at best, but more often as simply
evil. Many scientists, on the other hand, don't believe that anyone
with a modicum of intelligence can reject the results of evolutionary
theory in favor of biblical literalism. This divide prevents real
communication and any sort of progress.
Unfortunately, the view in science is not that of the public:
Stark world views with no place for God do
not play well in mainstream America, where almost everyone believes in
God. Most people think prayer works. Most people think that morality is
firmly grounded in God. The world is really supposed to make sense, to
be at least approximately the way that we experience it. There is
something profoundly wrong with claims that human beings are nothing
but selfish genes, that minds are but pieces of meat, and that meaning
is at best an illusion. Such harsh notions run counter to the folk
philosophy and conventional wisdom of Main Street America.
This volume covers Scientific Creationism,
Intelligent Design, and the positions of various evolutionary
biologists. A crucial aspect is that it doesn't just explain what your
"opponents" think, but, as is evident from the above quote, it explains
what your "opponents" think your position really is and how it sounds
to them. It isn't enough to understand what others believe, but also
what they think you believe, if true reconciliation is to be possible.
There is a tendency to assume that the debate over evolution and creationism is simply a conflict between two sides. Giberson and Yerxa, however, demonstrate that there is quite a lot more variety than is commonly thought and that multiple perspectives play a role in shaping the debate. There exists a great deal of confusion and misunderstanding, much of which may be dispelled through this book.
Austin Cline
About.com: Agnosticism/Atheism
Full Product Review
Critical Reviews of Oracles of Science